In the Metro Boston area there has been increased enforcement of bicycle laws with tickets being given to bike riding offenders. Do you think that more rigorous enforcement of pedestrian laws would be beneficial for creating a culture of lawfulness on our roads?

Asked by
Anonymous

Unfortunately, I think it would.  I say “unfortunately” because I’d prefer if people were obeying the law for some reason other than fear of getting a ticket.  I try to provide cyclists with such a reason in posts like this, and I’ve gotten a lot of positive feedback about it.

However, there will always be people for whom such arguments will just never work.  That’s where enforcement has to come in.

If you want proof of the effectiveness of this approach, just compare Boston pedestrians to those in California, where jaywalking is strictly enforced.  When I was in San Francisco this winter, I was shocked by the pedestrians’ absolute obedience to “Don’t Walk” signs.

At first, I just chalked it up to people not having anyplace to be (lousy hippies!).  Even during my short visit, I got the distinct impression that everyone in Boston is in much more of a rush than our laid back counterparts in ‘Frisco.  

However, when I mentioned my theory to a native, she was quick to explain that people are just afraid of getting a ticket.  At over $100 per infraction, I’m not surprised.  As much as I hate to say it, strict enforcement works.

Yours,

Josh

Here’s my helmet cam footage from the Rush Hour Race yesterday.  As you can see, I stopped at every red light.  Seriously, I only made two greens the entire way.

Though it’s not on by default, the video is available in 1080p, if that’s what you’re into.  Sorry about the shakiness.  Hopefully LivableStreets will cut it together with the other racers’ videos and make it into something cool.

Oh, and here’s a link to my route on Google Maps, in case any of you were wondering.

Thanks again to Lee Toma of Bike Milton for lending me his camera for the event!

Yours,

Josh

PS: That’s my mom that you can hear me hugging at the end.  She was very proud.

The case against fixies

It’s time to face the facts: fixies are unsafe.  

Actually, let me rephrase that: riding a fixie in traffic is unsafe.  Especially without brakes.

I know this post will do nothing to endear me to any of the legion of fixed gear enthusiasts out there, particularly not after I already denounced their favorite pastime.  But it’s the truth.  Fixies belong on a track, not in traffic.

Read More

I recently got in an accident with a car in Boston, where the car passed me, then turned right in front of me. They stopped short to avoid killing a jay-walking pedestrian, but I hit them from behind, sending me to the ER with a broken nose and teeth and a concussion. Is there a law in mass that would protect me in this situation? In a car, if I had hit him, I would probably be at fault, but what about on a bike? Are the rules different?

Asked by
Anonymous

Yikes! That sounds awful. There is a MA law that protects cyclists in that type of situation. Send me an email and we can set up a time to talk about it.

-Josh

PS: For questions like this, about a specific case or situation, it’s definitely better to email me.  I’d be happy to write a post on the subject, it’s just that attorney client confidentiality does not attach if I answer such questions publicly.

Bridgetown Ho!

It’s taken a little while, but the Bicyclist’s Accident Report has finally come to Portlandia, thanks to my pals at The Sprocket Podcast!  

Loosely focused on bikes, booze, and alternative transportation, the show makes its way into an assortment of other topics as its hosts discuss “simplifying the good life” with their various guests.

Read More